Across the U.S., we are seeing the most visible rise in homeless encampments in a generation. Nearly 61 percent of local and state homeless coalitions say they've experienced a rise in homelessness since the foreclosure crisis began in 2007. Or as our own Tim Harris is quoted, "What's happening in Seattle is what's happening everywhere else - on steroids."
read more | digg story
Sunday, September 28, 2008
In hard times, tent cities multiply
Posted by
Anitra Freeman
at
12:53 PM
0
comments
Labels: economics, foreclosures, homelessness, news, tent cities
Saturday, September 20, 2008
McCain flunks Fact Check again
McCain continues to distort Obama's tax plans. In one recent ad, he claims that Obama will tax home heating oil. The facts on the ground: Obama proposed a rebate of up to $1,000 per family to help cover increased heating oil costs; costs of the rebate to be funded by a windfall profits tax on oil companies.
The rationalization for the falsehood is, "Raising taxes on oil companies will result in higher costs to the consumer." That prediction is an honest opinion. The statement, "Obama will tax home heating oil" is not a prediction, it is not an opinion, it is a lie.
The prediction isn't a lie, it's just wrong. Like most of the so-called-conservatives, John McCain has never read Adam Smith and has no idea how a free market actually works.
If a business passes the cost of higher taxes on to the consumer, the consumer sees the cost up front. If consumption falls, business lowers the price and when that cuts into profits, business has a motivation for invention, innovation, finding lower-cost ways to deliver its product.
Trying to lower business costs by lowering business taxes is short-circuiting the free market cycle, NOT supporting it. It removes the motivation for innovation in production.
In the real world, when business taxes are lowered they do not pass the savings on to the customer. Why should they? What incentive do they have to do so?
And lowering taxes on business does NOT make the tax burden disappear. It only transfers it. Customers end up paying at the pump and ALSO at the IRS -- and even non-customers end up paying more at the IRS. too.
End of boring wonk session. Now for the rant:
Stop making American taxpayers subsidize Big Oil on the chance it will hold down the cost of your oil and gas. It never does. It only encourages them to gouge more, both up front and behind our backs.
We pay record prices at the pumps and oil companies post record profits. We pay record prices for groceries and agribusinesses post record profits. How many neurons does it take to recognize that you are being HAD?
read more | digg story
Posted by
Anitra Freeman
at
3:55 PM
0
comments
Labels: abortion politics, economics, election-2008, factcheck, mccain
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Ending Homelessness: for real
Current community efforts to help homeless people should continue. When we have a flood, we have to get people to high ground, get them fed and keep them warm.
My husband has a doctorate in math, and I checked this with him to make sure I'm right: If you have 100 people and 80 houses, at one person per house you will have 20 homeless people. If you move all 20 of those people into houses, you will displace 20 currently housed people, and still have 20 homeless people. If you improve the health, income, and education level of all the people currently homeless, you will have 20 healthy, wealthy, and well-educated homeless people.
I also checked this math with him: If you start with 20 homeless people, build 20 new houses and tear down 30, you will have 30 homeless people. The only thing Wes found wrong with that is that in real life, we are not losing housing at one-and-a-half times the rate we are creating it, we are losing housing at four times the rate we are creating it.
Building more affordable housing would be a step in the right direction. What we really need to do is rebuild the middle class. And just as labor and unemployed were allies in the campaign to create unemployment insurance, you -- what is left of the middle class and the people who are very poor and who are homeless -- need to be allies in building a society that will not have a big black hole in the middle.
- We need to decrease the wealth divide. "Redistribution of wealth" is a dirty term to many people, so stop it: stop redistributing wealth from the majority at the bottom to the minority at the top.
Much of the accumulation of wealth depends on unpaid labor, like that of volunteers and mothers and even homeless people. A living wage is the minimum fair return for labor. A labor force with strong bargaining power was one of the forces that built America's middle class. A strong middle class is the backbone of the country and the mainstay against homelessness. - We need to change the housing market.
- Make it profitable to create affordable housing. Some methods could be: tax incentives, subsidies, federal housing money.
- Make it unprofitable to destroy affordable housing. Some possible methods: tax penalties; a legislative cap on condo conversions.
- Get the federal government back into the creation of housing.
- Remember the potholes? Studying other cities that don't have potholes, to see what they are doing right? Countries that have a fraction of the homelessness that we do also have universal health care. It's time to bite the bullet and get it here.
- Let's change the social attitude. It is NOT virtuous to promote your own gain without regard for any cost to others. We ARE responsible for, and to, each other.
There is no either-or, short-term solutions OR long-term solutions. If we care about each other, we keep each other alive tonight AND we work to make the future better for each other.
If we care about each other, we will continue to increase our efforts to take care of people who are now homeless, get them out of homelessness, and prevent other people from falling into the hole. And, because we care about each other, we will also change our economy, our housing market, our government policies, our health care system, and whatever else it takes, to eliminate the black hole of homelessness forever.
- This is part 4 of my speech at the Washington State Coalition for the Homeless Conference, May 2007. The first three parts were:
Posted by
Anitra L. Freeman
at
3:58 PM
0
comments
Labels: economic justice, economics, ethical economics, homelessness, social justice, society
Reality Check for Committees to End Homelessness
Here in Seattle, the group in charge of our "Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness" is called the Committee to End Homelessness. Other areas of the U.S. have their own Ten Year Plans and their own Committees. Whatever they are called in other cities, these are equal realities across the country:
- There are more people homeless now than when all the "Ten Year Plans" to end homelessness began.
- More of the people with the most severe problems are ending up out on the street late at night when all the shelters are full.
- More people are dying outside, homeless and without shelter, every year.
- Violence against homeless people is increasing.
- With all the new low-cost housing created, three times as much is lost to redevelopment and condo conversions. We have a net loss.
- The wealth gap is widening, the middle class is vanishing like buffalo, job insecurity has become the new norm.
- Health care costs keep rising, along with the numbers of people who can’t afford health insurance.
- At a Roots of Poverty conference I attended years ago, incarceration was identified as one of the roots of poverty, and to this day, nothing has changed. The U.S. has the highest number of people incarcerated than any other country in the rest of the world, and it’s giving Communist Red China a run for the money for the world record. We’ve already got their official numbers beat. Let’s see if we can beat their unofficial numbers!
- Our social fabric is cut to shreds. Lack, or loss, of a social network is the most basic reason a housed person becomes a “homeless person.” The lack, or loss, of a sense of community, of responsibility to our neighbor whatever her religion, politics, or even personality, is the basic reason the black hole of homelessness exists for her to fall into.
- Respect for human dignity is at an all-time low. The homeless person who is at the bottom of the housing market is also at the bottom of the clothing market, and he doesn’t go naked, does he? No. THAT would offend our morality.
What has happened over the last forty years?
- The real income (purchasing power) of 60% of our population has gone down.
- The federal government has invested less and less money in housing. Since 1996 they've spent $0.
- In private housing development, developers seek the most profit out of every square inch of real estate, resulting in the continual destruction of low-cost housing in order to put up high-cost housing.
- The cost of health care has continued to rise, while less and less of the population have any form of health insurance.
- The numbers of homeless people have skyrocketed.
- The stigma of homelessness was created. Unemployment insurance was won by a campaign of working people and out-of-work, often homeless people, allied. Most housed people at that time had no problem seeing themselves in the shoes of someone who was homeless. Now “homeless” is a separate class, and homeless people are to be treated differently than anyone else is treated.
What happened in the last forty years was, we created homelessness. In order to end it, we have to reverse what we did to create it.
So far, none of the Ten Year Plans are doing that.
- This is part 3 of my speech at the Washington State Coalition for the Homeless Conference, May 2007. The whole sequence is:
- The Pothole Analogy
- A Word to the Housed
- Reality Check for Committees to End Homelessness
- Ending Homelessness: for real
Posted by
Anitra L. Freeman
at
3:39 PM
0
comments
Labels: committee to end homelessness, economic justice, economics, homelessness, ten year plans
A Word to the Housed
We all know homelessness hurts homeless people. Some are beginning to realize that homelessness hurts all of us.
The full reality is, the same system that creates homelessness creates most of your problems, too. You work hard to help people who often yell at you because they can't yell at the people who are really abusing and frustrating them; you accomplish something each day but the scope of the problem keeps getting worse; then you go home and wrestle with the bills and worry over how you are going to pay for your son's dental care or your daughter's education.
We're all in this together. To get out of it, we all have to work together. The noble housed people don't have to rescue the poor homeless people; the oppressed homeless people do not have to force the privileged housed people to rescue them. All us chickens have to work together to rebuild the leaky henhouse. 'Cause guess what? There's nobody here but us chickens.
- This is part 2 of my speech at the Washington State Coalition for the Homeless Conference, May 2007. The entire sequence is:
Posted by
Anitra L. Freeman
at
3:29 PM
0
comments
Labels: economics, homeless services, homelessness, society
Monday, October 15, 2007
You Get What You Pay For: Chevron’s Human Rights Problems Span Three Continents
I saw Chevron's greenwashing "Human Energy" ad for the first time tonight, and my BS meter began screaming. I knew I'd seen something that ran counter to the ad's claims. It didn't take much searching to find it: last month, a federal judge ruled to force Chevron to stand trial in the U.S. for the massacre of Nigerian villagers.
- And there's more:
- How did things get to this point? The Free Market Missionaries convinced us -- not all of us, but enough -- that:
- Pursuing personal benefit no matter what the cost to anyone else is a moral stand, and all talk about "the common good" is evil communism;
- The only human values, the only values of any kind, are those that can be sold on the market so that a businessman can make a buck off them. Anybody who says there are personal benefits not measurable by money is trying to take your money (except MasterCard, who wants to give you money).
- Laws against murder, theft, and violating contracts are just and proper (we couldn't do business without them) but laws protecting health, safety, the environment, the common good, or any other value we can't make an immediate profit on are nanny-state attempts to tell you what's good for you. Government shouldn't tell you what's good for you! That's the job of private business! ("Private" meaning "it's none of your business how we do it.")
The American public bought that, and paid for it, and is paying for it. We created an economic system that rewards unethical behavior and, surprise, we get unethical behavior.
We created it, we can uncreate it. An economy that rewards ethical behavior and penalizes unethical behavior is not a Big Brother (or Big Nanny). Most people don't have to be told what's right and what's wrong -- that's why we have laws to enforce right and wrong on those who do have to be told. We want to live in an ethical society. That is the real American way.
- Free Market Missionaries are alive and well even though their abstractions don't translate to reality
Posted by
Anitra L. Freeman
at
8:34 AM
0
comments
Labels: chevron, corporate corruption, economics, ethical economics, ethical society, ethics, free market missionaries, globalization